Founding memory

Founder's testimony

The inner origin of Beith David, carried with faithfulness and responsibility.

An encounter

An encounter, a calling

Portrait of Shmouel, wearing a blue garment, in his room.
Shmouel, in the blue garment he wore on the day of the encounter.

Some encounters are never forgotten. They open a path.

On the 15th of Av 5773, David, founder of Beith David, met Shmouel.

Even before this encounter, Shmouel had announced to those close to him that he was waiting for a Frenchman then in Israel, who would come to see him in his room before Tishri 5773.

That is exactly what happened.

Shmouel was a young child affected by cerebral motor disability, deprived of ordinary speech. Since his birth, he had lived in a specialised hospital room, surrounded by the care necessary for his survival.

He had not grown up like other children. He had not studied Torah in a school. He had not discovered the world through ordinary paths.

And yet, through facilitated writing, he transmitted messages of overwhelming depth about Israel, the Torah, the Geulah and the spiritual state of the world.

What struck those close to him was the gap between his apparent condition, his absence of ordinary study, his isolation since birth, and the depth of what he wrote.

This encounter marked David deeply. It awakened in him a consciousness present since childhood: to serve the Torah, Israel, the Geulah, the Davidic kingship, justice and peace.

Mode of communication

Facilitated writing

Shmouel communicated through facilitated writing: a person accompanied his hand so as to allow him to write what he could not say by speech.

This mode of communication is known and discussed. It is mentioned here simply to clarify the framework of the testimony.

In the case of Shmouel, what struck those who approached him was the striking gap between his apparent condition and the depth of what he wrote.

A year

A year alongside Shmouel

After this encounter, David stayed close to Shmouel for about a year.

From this very encounter, even though he had never left his specialised hospital room since his birth, Shmouel wrote a phrase that marked his loved ones deeply: “I am going to make my globalisation.”

During this period he wrote abundantly. His messages spoke of the Geulah, of Israel, of the nations and of the role of our generation.

This year was decisive. It gave David the consciousness that this word was not meant to remain enclosed within a single room.

His word

The word of Shmouel

Shmouel's messages were simple in their axis, but very powerful in their scope.

He spoke of the Geulah as a reality already sealed in heaven. He called Israel to prepare itself, to return to the Torah, to strengthen teshuvah, to rediscover its bond with the Land of Israel and to move forward as one single heart.

He also spoke of the “true world”: a world in which the presence of G-d, justice and truth would no longer be hidden.

To the nations, his message held in a single sentence: to make of G-d the truth of this world.

The heart of his message was simple: Israel must prepare itself, return to the Torah, recover its land, and make of G-d's truth a light for the world.

These words are transmitted because they lit a fire that has not since been extinguished.

A word that spreads

From the room to the people

The sentence “I am going to make my globalisation” then took on a concrete meaning.

Shmouel's messages were transmitted to Jews in France, in Israel and elsewhere. Eighteen conferences were held throughout the Paris region, generally gathering between 50 and 150 people.

Many came out of curiosity. Many left deeply moved. In some, this word awakened the desire to return to Israel; in others, it accelerated a path of Aliyah already underway.

The echo reached Israel, where several spiritual figures were informed of Shmouel's story.

For Beith David, this remains a powerful sign: a word born in a child's room, carried by a being deprived of ordinary speech, was able to reach far beyond what circumstances seemed to allow.

A word received

A clarity turned toward the Geulah

Many of those who approached Shmouel felt in his word an unusual clarity, turned toward the Geulah, teshuvah and the preparation of Israel.

Some perceived in it a prophetic dimension.

This testimony does not need to be imposed. It is transmitted for what it brought to birth: a fire of Torah, of Geulah and of faithfulness to Israel.

Axes of the message

The axes of Shmouel's message

One sentence sums up the spirit of his message: “You must move forward as one single heart in Israel.”

01

The Geulah

Shmouel spoke of the Geulah as a reality that G-d advances in history, calling Israel to prepare inwardly.

02

The return of Israel

He called the Jewish people to rediscover its living bond with the Land of Israel, a place of blessing and spiritual preparation.

03

The true world

He spoke of a “true world” in which the presence of G-d, justice and truth would no longer be veiled.

04

One single heart

His message called Israel to move forward as one single heart, in the Torah, teshuvah and unity.

05

To warn, not to convince

To transmit without forcing: to warn, then to leave each one before his own free will.

06

The nations

To the nations, his message was to make of G-d the truth of this world, source of morality, dignity and peace.

07

Malkhut Israel

His message awakened a consciousness of Malkhut Israel: not political domination, but an order of Torah, of divine service and of collective life.

His Aliyah

His Aliyah and his encounters in Israel

In May 2015, at his request, Shmouel made his Aliyah with his loved ones. The one who called Israel to return to its land thus inscribed his own path into the return of Israel.

He then asked to meet several great tsadikim of Israel in order to transmit to them a personal message linked to the Geulah. He was received by Rav Chaim Kanievsky, Rabbi Amos of Netanya, Rav Yitzchak Ginsburgh and Rav Shalom Arush. These encounters were lived with wonder, respect and emotion, in an exchange of blessings.

These encounters are mentioned with respect, without making them an argument of authority.

A few days later, Shmouel asked to go to the Kotel with his mother and David, founder of Beith David.

The following night, on the 6th of Av 5776, he left this world in his room.

His word was not extinguished with his departure. It left in hearts a torch: to prepare the people for the Geulah, to make of the Torah a living word, to recall the return of Israel and to serve G-d with truth, justice and peace.

Biblical reference

The biblical figure of Shmuel

In the Bible, the prophet Samuel holds a unique place: judge and prophet of Israel, he accompanies the passage from the Judges to kingship, anoints Shaoul and then David, and so prepares the way of the Davidic kingship.

Beith David receives the reference to Shmouel as a call to reflect on this moment in the history of Israel where prophecy, justice and kingship meet.

A call

What this memory brought to birth

For David, founder of Beith David, this encounter was not the beginning of a claim. It awakened a consciousness present since childhood: to serve the Torah, to honour the masters of Israel, to make known the wisdom of Jerusalem and to contribute to the spiritual restoration of the people.

Beith David was born in the continuation of this memory: an initiative of diffusion and transmission, faithful to the sages of Israel, called to revive a consciousness of Torah, of justice, of peace and of Malkhut Israel.

“The fire of origin must not become a claim; it must become a light.”

To situate this phenomenon

The story of Shmouel does not stand in a vacuum. In the Jewish world, accounts linked to persons deprived of ordinary speech have already marked consciences, notably around the Torah, the soul, teshuvah and the Geulah.

French-speaking Jewish platforms have addressed this subject, and academic works have studied the spiritual use of facilitated communication in certain Israeli Orthodox milieus.

These references do not prove the story of Shmouel and ground no authority. They simply show that the subject of communication by persons deprived of ordinary speech has already been addressed in the Jewish world, with interest and prudence.